|
Muhammad
bin ‘Abdal Wahab and the “Wahabis.”
The
reason why this Sect are often called Wahabis boils down to the name of
one of their main leaders; Muhammad
Bin Abdul Wahab. It is often believed, that Abdul Wahab
started the “crusade” against the Sunni Muslims, but In reality, he
did not start this, it was started in the time of Ali
RadiAllao-unho. Throughout history there have been different
names for this Sect, but in the eighth century, one of their leaders
use to call himself Salafi. Even today, this Sect
has four names SALAFI, WAHABI, NAJDI and AHL-HADITH - although today
they prefer to call themselves Salafi.
This
Sect would not have been as famous as it is but at the time of Muhammad
Bin Abdul Wahab. Even today, if a person or a number of people
were to petition the country of Saudia Arabia, they would receive
funds or grants if they promise that a Mosque or Madrassah would be
built - to teach the Wahabi cirriculum. Or if a magazine would begin
to circulate then, it too would receive funds to propogate the Wahabi
beleifs. It is in this way, and by currently owning large, well
equipt publishing houses, that the Wahabis have been able to mass
distribute and mass circulate misinformation about the Ahle As Sunnah
Wal Jammat and propogate their own beliefs passing them under the
guise of “Salafi” Islam. Many, if not all, of their publications
are beautifully designed but, this cannot hide the fact that they
are continually trying to break Sunni Muslims from a scholarship this
has flourished for over 1400 years. The head office of this
“organisation” is in the Najd region, that was where Muhammad bin
Abdul Wahab was born.
He
was born at the beginning of the 12th century (Hijri) In Jazeera
tul Arab, the name given by the Prophet (May Allah bless him and
grant him peace) to which has been changed by the Saudi Royal family to that of their
grandFathers to Saudi Arabia.
He was born in Najd so that is why often he was referred to as Muhammad
Bin Abdul Wahab Najdi in
his time.
Shaytan
came in the form of the Najdi Shaykh
Hafidhh
Ibn Kathir writes: when the Kuffar of Makkah had a meeting concerning
the Prophet Sallal laho alihi wasalam, an old man came claiming
“I am a Najdi, what ever you want to
know, I will be helpful”. This Najdi Shaykh then gave his view against
the Prophet (Sallallahu’ aliahi wa sallam), through out the meeting.
[Tareekh
Ibn Kathir. Volume 4]
The
Prophet [May Allah bless Him and grant Him peace] stated: I
fear from the Najdi’s.
[Bukhari
Chapter on Jihad]
The
Prophet [May Allah bless Him and grant Him peace] stated: That
the Fitnah will emerge from the east. [Bukhari, Kitab-ul-Fitnah]
Abdullah
Ibn Umar narrates:
The Prophet [May Allah bless Him and
grant Him peace] made Du’a for Syria and Yemen, some people asked
him: “Ya Rasoolallah (Sallallahu’ aliahi wa sallam) pray for Najd.”
The Prophet [May Allah bless Him and grant Him peace] again repeated
Dua for Syria and Yemen. They again requested for Najd. Upon the third time
the Prophet [May Allah bless Him and grant Him peace] said: “There
will be earthquakes there, tribulations will emerge there and a horn
of Shaytan will emerge from there”. [Bukhari, Kitabul
Fitan]
The
brother of Muhammad bin Abdul Wahab al Najdi, Shaykh Sulaiman bin
Abdul Wahab, said about his brother, “The horn of Shaytan which the Prophet
(Sallallahu’ aliahi wa sallam) referred to is you.”
[Sawaa’iqul
Ilahiya]
The
false Prophet, Musailima Kadhab was also born in
Najd. After reading the history of Najd, you will see that this is
a place of Sh’yateen. Secondly the Prophet [May Allah bless Him and
grant Him peace] predicted earthquakes and tribulations for this place
indeed there occurred such an earthquake that we can still hear its
bang over 2 centuries later.
Many
people say that Najd is high land and that the Dua was not made regarding
the high land. However in this Hadith the Prophet [May Allah bless
Him and grant Him peace] mentioned the places Syria, Yemen and not
the type of land, therefore the word Najd in this Hadith refers to
the place Najd itself which is in Saudi Arabia not in Iraq.
Muhammad
bin Abdul Wahab’s Education
He
was educated in the Najd, Basra and Damascus, his brothers and parents
were of the Aqeedah of Ahl-e-sunnah but, through reading Ibn
Taymiyyah’s books, he chose to differ in belief with the rest
of his family, who were not pleased with him. His brother Muhammad
Bin Abdul Wahab Sulaiman wrote a book against him called ‘Suwaa’iq-ul-Ilahia’, in which he
gives the answers to all Muhammad Ibn Abdul Wahab’s objections.
Shaykh
Uthman Bin Basheer & Shaykh Juhri takes all the information we
will provide here from Tareekh-e-Najd, in the book called Muhammad
bin Abdul Wahab. Some Najdi says that Muhammad Bin Abdul Wahab
Sulaiman, during his lifetime, converted to Wahabism, however there
is no evidence to prove this.
Shaykh
Najdi started a conspiracy against Ahl-as-Sunnah. This movement is
called Al-Wahhabiyyah. (“Shaykh Juri in Muhammad bin Abdul
Wahab. Page 13”)
There
are four names by which Wahabis are famous, Wahabis, Najdi, Salafi,
& Ahl-e-Hadith. Ah-l-Hadith was at the time when the British
were ruling in India, and the followers of Muhammad Bin Abdul Wahab
Najdi were called Wahabis but Maulana Muhammad Hussain Batalvi made
an application to the viceroy of India that they be called Ahl-e-Hadith
rather than Wahabi, this application was granted. That is the reason
why Maulana Muhammad Hussain wrote: It is Haram to do Jihad (War)
against the British. [“Iqtisaad-fi-Massaiil-Jihad”]
Mirza
Hairat from Delhi in his book Hayyat-e-Tayybiyah writes that
Moulana Ismail from Delhi a founder of Wahabi in India, said
in his speech in Calcutta “ It is Harram to do Jihad against the British.”
These people are so loyal to the British so how could the British
not accept their application.
Muhammad
Bin Abdul Wahab Najdi influenced the spouse of the Amier of Dur’iyaa,
Muhammad bin Sa’ud, to his movement and later the Amir also followed.
Muhammad Bin Abdul Wahab Najdi asked him to aid his movement with
his power. Muhammad bin Sa’ud assisted with spreading their reign
over boundaries beyond Duri’yaa. Lawrence of Arabia was a spy for
the British in Arabia and pretended to be a Muslim. He promoted Arab
Nationalism and always said to the people, ‘O Arabs, Islam started
in Arabia, so to rule is your right, why do you live under the Uthmanni
Khilaffat? This brainwashing worked well and helped in destroying
the Uthmaani Khilaffat. Muhammad Bin Abdul Wahab Najdi and Muhammad
bin Saood were attracted to this nationalistic movement. Muhammad
Bin Abdul Wahab Najdi labelled this to be Jihad and said: “In Hijaz,
the people are worshipping other than Allah”.
“Tareek
Najd-Uthman bin Bashir”
Muhammad
Hasni wrote that Muhammad Bin Abdul Wahab Najdi said: “When I went
to study in Basra, mushriks would ask me questions and I would leave
them very surprised with my answers”. “Tareek Aal-e-Saood”
Shaykh
Juri states: “Muhammad bin Abdul Wahab Najdi called The Ahl-e-sunnah
Muslims Kafirs & Mushriks apart from himself and his (blind) followers”.
The proof for this is that Muhammad Bin Abdul Wahab himself said that
in Basra, Mushriks would come and ask me questions, these people were
Muslims and thus Muhammad Bin Abdul Wahab only considers himself and
his followers to be Muslims.
[“Muhammad
Bin Abdul Wahab”]
Muhammad
Bin Abdul Wahab wrote. Those people who ask for intercession
from Prophets and Angels and make Du’a through their Waseela, to become
closer to Allah, are commiting sins. Due to this crime it is
permitted to kill them and to take their possessions.
[“Kashf-u-Shubhaat”]
Shaykh
Attar wrote that Shaykh Najdi said: “I declare war on these people
as the Prophet [May Allah bless Him and grant Him peace] declared
war on the Kuffar of Makkah, against those people with corrupt beliefs”.
Corrupt beliefs refers to those people who seek intercession from
Anbiyah, Awliyah, and they make their Dua through them (Waseela) and
those people who travelled to the Prophet [May Allah bless Him and
grant Him peace]’s grave with the intention to seek help other than
Allah’s.
[“Muhammad
Bin Abdul Wahab’ page.55”]
The
people who leave their corrupt beliefs and join us then, their blood
will be saved, and those people who do not do ‘Tasuba’ (Repent) or
pay jiz’eiya get ready to do battle. Then Muhammad Bin Abdul Wahab
Attar says: “To spread the good, It is in Islam as to do Jihad, who
can refuse this.”
[“Shaykh
Ahmed Attar”]
Mas’ood
Aalam Nadwi wrote that Muhammad bin Abdul Wahab Najdi has called only
those Muslims kafir who make Du’a with the Waseela of Prophets and
Awliya, and he made jihad against them. [“Mas’ood Aalam Nadwi”]
All
these statements prove that Muhammad bin Abdul Wahab Najdi’s Jihad
was not against kafirs but against those Muslims who held the Aq’aid
of Ahl-e-Sunnah, like the Khawarij, he considered all other Muslims
to be kafirs.
Khawarji’s
are those people who consider all other Muslims to be non-believers
apart from themselves. They are supposed to kill people who
have trust in pious people, as they did with Khabab for saying that
he loved Ali radi-allah-ho-unho. Also they would call
any person who has committed a major sin a non-believer. Even
for anything small they would call the Sahabas non-believer’s as they
did with Uthman, Talha, and Zubair Radi allahu taala unhu ajmaeen.
The
Khawrij’s would only take the literal meaning of the Holy Qur’an and
that would be it they would take it no further. They would call the
Sahee (true) Hadith fabricated, such as Hadith-e-Rajm, (stoning the
Adulator to death), they would label their opponents non-believers
and consider it right to take their belongings and their wives as
slave girls. When the Khawarij spoke they would try to refer to the
Qur’an or the Hadith as much as possible.
It
has been said by Abdullah bin Umar radi-allah-hounho that Khawarij’s
are so mischievous that they fit those Qur’anic verses that were revealed
about the non-believers.
“Bukhari
chap, Al-murtadeen”
For
further details please consult books by Ibn Hazam Sharastani, Abu-Mansoor
Ma’tirdi, Abu-Zahra Misrei and Mazhabe Islamiyah This
was a strange thing as even Abdul Wahab’s blind followers could
not digest it. Shaykh Juhri wrote: ‘I think that Muhammad Bin Abdul
Wahab Najdi apart from himself and his followers has labelled all
other Muslims as kafir; while not all Muslims have worshipped graves
and especially the Ulama. At the time no Muslim’s worshiped grave’s
but that was an excuse by Muhammad Bin Abdul Wahab Najdi so that he
could kill the Muslims.
[“Muhammad
Ibn Abdul Wahab page 36”]
Shaykh
Juhri says: “I cannot find any reason why they should all have been
labelled Kafirs”. Juhri was a strong follower of Muhammad Bin Abdul
Wahab but even he was surprised at this action by [Muhammad Bin Abdal
Wahab ]
Now
returning to the movement of Muhammad bin Abdul Wahab Najdi, with
the help of Amir-e-Duriya He destroyed the shrines. (Graves of Companions)
Companions who were in the Najd.
He
killed those people who were leaders of the Ahl-e-Sunnah and took
their properties and possessions. With the support of those Arabs
that were nationalist. They continued increasing their reign, coming
out of Najd until Hijaz was taken by them and they managed to win
control over the whole of Jazeerat-ul-Arab.
During
this time the Ottoman Khilafah was busy engaged in international battles
and was therefore unable to respond in a swift manner. In 22 June
1792, Muhammad bin Abdul Wahab Najdi died upon which Qadhi Shawkaani
wrote a poem with regard to this incident; one sentence was:
“Muhammad bin Abdul Wahab was that son, with whose Noor the Hijaz
and its surrounding places became enlightened”. See how the
person who sought help from the Kafirs is being praised!!!
For
some time after, the rule was in the hands of Ahle-Saud. It was during
this time, during the reign of the son of Muhammad ibn Saud, that
the Ottomans sent Muhammad Ali Pasha against him, who defeated him,
finished their influence in the reign. Again’ Jazeeratul Arab
became part of the Islamic Caliphate, the royal family fled to Kuwait.
Some time later, the Ahl-e-Saood managed to re-gain control over Jazeeratul
Arab and changed its name to Saudi Arabia. Grants were given from
abroad to spread Wahabi’ism. Initially it was spread by the sword
but now it is through money. The Saudis came to Europe and spent
the wealth from the Bait-ul-Maal as though it were their Father’s
wealth. In front of the guilty Saudi Ulamas all this Haram and Bid’ah
goes on but they say nothing, but will still give Fatwa’s against
Milad-un-Nabi.
An
interesting story: When Shaykh Faisal was deputy prime minister of
Saudi Arabia, he toured India, and put flowers upon Mahatma Ghandi’s
grave:
[“News,
11th May 1955”]
In
1957 Shah Sa’ud went on a tour to America, with him was the defence
minister Fahad bin Sa’ud, who put flowers on the grave of George Washington.
[“Kohstaan 2nd February 1957”]
When
Saudi Shaykhs go to Muslim countries they do not place flowers on
any of the graves of the Awliya because it may dent their Aqeedah,
but by placing flowers upon the graves of Mahatma Ghandi & George
Washington maybe this strengthens their Aqeedah.
Shah
Sa’ud whilst on tour in India said, “I am satisfied with Indian government
that they are treating the Muslims with justice”. This was at
the time when Muslims were being sacrificed in Kashmir.
Shah
Sa’ood invited the Indian Prime Minister, Pandat Jawahar Nehru to
tour Saudi Arabia, When he arrived, the newspaper ‘Al-Balad Sa’oodia
Makkah’ reported thus:
“When
Nehru arrived in Riyadh, the Indian national anthem was played, the
women of the royal family left their homes in the cars to welcome
him.” Every thing we have written about Nehru is taken
from Tareek Najd-wa-Hijaz by Allma Ghulam Rasood Sa’idi and Safar
Nama by Muhammad Asim Najdi who was with Maudoodi when he toured in
1960.
Al-Balad
Sa’oodia then wrote an article: We welcome Nehru as he is a peaceful
and sensible person, and it is our prayer that he lives thousands
of years. Shah Sa’ood secretary colonel Sadat said: ‘Mr Nehru soft
voice has more effect than the bang of guns’ and called him the angel
of Asia and also called him a Rasool’ our assumption is that he did
not mean Prophet but messenger just as many Muslims use the name Abdul
Mustafa, meaning not a worshipper but a follower.
When
they received Nehru, they called him Aman-ur-Rasool. He toured a school
where the rulers studied, where the Geeta was sung. We have a right
to ask: “why do not the Saudi Ulama say that these things are
Haram, to sing Geeta, for Muslim women to come out of their homes
to welcome Kafir rulers, to put flowers on the graves of kaafirs,
to call the person who slaughtered uncountable Muslims in India a
messenger of peace (Amman)? Oh those who ask for authentic proof for
Milad-un Nabi, by Allah show us even a da’eef (weak) hadith
to justify these actions”.
When
they welcomed Nehru in such a way, back. In India and Pakistan marches
and rallies were organised in protest. The King was sent a telegram
in 1960 by Saiyed Maududi, who came from Hajj to Saudi, he was invited
on Royal order to Riyadh. Delivering his speech he said: “If
we were to invite the Prime Minister of Israel to Pakistan and welcome
him like you welcomed Nehru, how would you feel? You called the enemy
of Muslims the messenger of peace”. The whole world criticised them
for this, but no Saudi Ulama made any objections.
In
the west people do Dhikr in Mosques, and do Na’at Khanni, once a month
they read the Qur’an and convey the reward to Muslims who have
parted from this world, especially Shaykh Abdul Qadir Jilanis. The
Najdi students who come to the west Write piles of books against this
and ask for authentic proofs but the people and leaders of their own
countries they were to put flowers on the graves of kaffirs they would
quietly digest it .
|